GUN TRUCK
By Miguel Miranda
The former Soviet
Union built the most dangerous APC’s in the world. Whether wheeled
or tracked these machines always packed a punch and had incredible speed. By
comparison, until the advent of the IFV, NATO’s only successful response to the
Soviet’s superb APC development was the American M113—a remarkable, albeit
utilitarian, vehicle in its own right.
To think the whole concept of the personnel
carrier, armed and armored for combat, didn’t catch on for some years after
World War Two and it was still the Soviets who led the way with an impressive
range of vehicles. Including a very peculiar truck.
As a matter of fact, the Soviets inadvertently arrived at the concept in 1950 after using their 6x6 ZiS-151 truck as the basis for an armored troop transporter whose exterior vaguely resembled a US Army half track.
This hybrid vehicle was designed by a team
of engineers led by B.M. Fitterman and staffed by K.M. Androsov, V.F. Rodionov,
A.P. Petrenko, P.P. Tchernayev, and N.I. Orlov.
The final result was the Bronetransporter-152 or BTR-152. It was
ugly, to be honest. But it promised to shield a dozen infantrymen from harm and
mount the kind of heavy weapons that would make NATO troopers’ toes curl. (It
wasn’t actually the first BTR, a distinction reserved for the 4x4 BTR-40.)
The BTR-152 was hardly a far cry from its
ancestors, trucks and half-tracks alike, and even performed like these
vehicles. It ran on a 110 horsepower ZiS-123 gasoline engine and managed a top
speed of 68 kilometers per hour. Unlike the 8x8 BTR’s that succeeded it, the
152 wasn’t amphibious and could only manage fording across 30 inches of water.
This despite the fact that its welded steel
armor wasn’t really as tough as it appeared—more on this later.
What is beyond question, however, is the
BTR-152 was an inelegant marvel that was tough, reliable, and provided a
fighting chance for every poor man’s army in a dozen forgotten wars.
It’s still being driven around today, for
eff’s sake.
THE PERSONNEL CARRIER
The BTR-152 was a project of the Zavod Imeni Stalina plant or ZiS in Moscow and irony of
ironies before World War Two its truck production line was modernized by an
American firm.
This meant that American DNA permeated the
modern lineage of Soviet truck manufacturing. Undeniable proof of another
bizarre twist in the Cold War’s technological showdown. It deserves mention
that substantial quantities of US Army M2 half tracks were transported to the USSR
as Lend Lease.
Initial production was carried out at the
ZiS’ Automotive Factory No.2 from 1950 until 1956. It was then shifted to the
Zavod imeni Likhacheva or ZiL until production ceased in 1962.
The M2 half track was a genuine multirole platform that could be equipped for various tasks. That front grille looks familiar though. Hmmm... |
The influences that shaped the BTR-152 gave
it its best asset: spaciousness. Compared to all the other Soviet APCs that
followed the BTR-152 never lacked for space in its passenger compartment. On
paper the Soviets figured out 15 troopers could fit at the back plus a driver
and co-driver in the cab. Fifteen!
This is what an empty BTR-152B looks like. Troops enter from a rear swing door and parallel rows of seats can fit seven each. The 15th trooper mans the missing Goryunov machine gun. But ideally there should be a machine gun up front.
For a wheeled APC driving the BTR-152
wasn’t a chore. That is, so long as no hostile fire was directed at it.
|
Its design patterned after the M2 half
track, the BTR-152’s windshield was separated into two panels. When buttoned up
the driver just had to lower the hatches and reduce his vision to those classic
Soviet viewing slits. (That’s a fuel tank behind the driver’s seat, by the
way.)
The side doors were just as interesting.
The upper panels could be lowered for better visibility and/or ventilation.
From a different angle in a better preserved vehicle. |
In case you ever need to drive a BTR-152
here’s a handy guide to what’s what.
- Throttle pedal carburetor
- Brake pedal
- Clutch pedal
- Control panel
- Signal button
- Tire air control
- Gear lever transfer
- Air vents and windscreens
- Wiper
- Front axle lever
- Handbrake lever
- ???
- ???
- ???
- Tire valve block
- Gearbox shift
- Heater
- Lever for radiator shutters
And if you want to ace a quiz on the parts
of a BTR-152K—a later variant with an armored roof—this might come in handy.
- Ax
- Compartment for RPG launcher
- Headset bag
- Container for RPG rockets
- Compartment for driver/co-driver personal effects
- Compartment for spare radio parts
- Gun rack
- Compartment for spare parts
- Compartment for ammunition
- Starting lamp
- Oil tank
- Compartment for spare parts
- Block winch
- Spare tire
- Ammunition box
- Shovel
- Canvass bucket
- Spare box
- Mounting kit
- Antenna
- First aid kit
- Tool kit
- Compartment for spare parts
- Saw
- Extinguisher
- “Document bag”
- Jack
- Starting handle
- Tow rope
Indeed, the BTR-152 had a lot of neat
features that are a bit scarce in modern APCs.
Sometimes a lug wrench was affixed beneath
the driver’s door.
Don’t forget the spare tire attached to the
rear swing door!
You’d think these tools were enough for
dismounted infantry to build a log cabin. But such implements were needed to
ready a prepared position if the situation arose.
Also notice the tarpaulin spread over the
BTR-152. This was a common half-measure to protect the BTR’s interior from snow
and rain. The arrival of the BTR-152K with three roof hatches rectified this
glaring fault.
Unlike the emerging generation of NATO
APCs, the BTR-152 was designed to allow its passengers to fight from within the
vehicle. Hence the three circular firing ports on either side of the hull and
two additional firing ports next to the rear swing door.
This meant infantry could fight at
360-degrees within the BTR-152.
The BTR-152’s armored grilles could be opened and closed at the push of a dashboard button. This was to protect the radiator from gunfire. Some analysts claim this safety feature made the BTR-52 prone to overheating.
But take note of the BTR-152’s headlights
in the photo above. The original BTR-152 only had a single pair and so did
succeeding variants. However, by the time the BTR-152V1 rolled out an
additional pair of infrared lights were installed along with improvements to
the chassis and transmission. See below.
The bulge on the bumper, by the way, was
the housing for the mechanical winch. The original BTR-152 and BTR-152A only
had flat bumpers with a length of wire rope (for towing) wrapped around it. The
winch first appeared on the BTR-152B and succeeding variants and was encased in
a special container with a round flip top.
The BTR-152 also had a few worrisome quirks
like…
Every time the Soviets built an APC their
engineers would place the fuel tank in the most awkward position imaginable.
This applied to the BTR-152, where separate fuel tanks were located behind the
driver and co-driver’s seats. The photo above captures the tank behind the
co-driver.
The BTR-152’s fuel tanks were identifiable
from the outside via the round caps behind the driver and co-driver’s doors.
It might have been the vulnerability posed
by these tanks that explains the large number of BTR-152’s abandoned in combat.
This phenomenon was quite common during the Six Day War when captured or
salvaged BTR-152’s resulted in the IDF having to maintain a whole fleet of
these APCs.
Maybe the driver and crew, being aware of
the BTR-152’s thin armor and the proximity of the fuel tanks, always found it
sensible to vacate the vehicle one it was crippled.
Since it was based on a proven truck
chassis, the BTR-152 was adaptable for multiple roles. It could also tow stuff,
like artillery or a ZU-23-2 anti-aircraft gun.
There were reportedly several BTR-152
variants. But thanks to the wonders of online research it has come to light
that not only were there more different types of BTR-152’s—the Soviets
classified them alphabetically! This makes it easier to identify them.
For the record, the ZiS and ZiL factories recognized 14 BTR-152 variants. Their combined production numbers reached 12, 421 units while the highest estimate for BTR-152’s built is a rounded figure of 15,000.
For the record, the ZiS and ZiL factories recognized 14 BTR-152 variants. Their combined production numbers reached 12, 421 units while the highest estimate for BTR-152’s built is a rounded figure of 15,000.
Here’s the breakdown.
BTR-152 – Original open top production
variant armed with a Goryunov machine gun. (See above.)
BTR-152A – The first genuine an
anti-aircraft variant although the type of gun used wasn’t specified.
BTR-152B/1 – A mechanical winch drum was
installed on the bumper beneath the grille.
BTR-152D – A BTR-152V mounting a 14.5mm
ZPU-2
BTR-152E – A BTR-152V1 with a ZPU-2.
BTR-152S – A so-called “communication variant” with a large radio antennae near the windshield.
BTR-152U - The passenger compartment is enclosed and enlarged. This is the BTR-152 converted into a mobile command post.
BTR-152S – A so-called “communication variant” with a large radio antennae near the windshield.
BTR-152U - The passenger compartment is enclosed and enlarged. This is the BTR-152 converted into a mobile command post.
BTR-152V1 – Infrared headlights installed
for driver visibility along with crew compartment heater and a blower for
windshield.
BTR-152V – The heavily upgraded variant
produced by ZiL from 1956 onward. Had equidistant tires and axels, increased
performance, and an enclosed passenger compartment.
BTR-152K – An armored roof with three
hatches installed on a BTR-152V.
BTR-152 HS.404 – An Israeli variant mounted
with an HS.404 anti-aircraft gun.
BTR-152B ZU-23-2 – A technical used by Arab
militias in the Levant armed with twin 23mm
anti-aircraft guns.
This is the BTR-152K converted into an
ambulance.
Arab forces were among the BTR-152’s most prolific users. This modified BTR-152 captured by the IDF was converted into a tow truck/recovery vehicle by a Lebanese militia. |
Here’s the rare and completely weird BTR-152U, a command vehicle. It looks like a house built on a truck. |
WEAPONRY
This profile dubs the BTR-152 a “Gun
Truck.” The term itself conjures visions of a mean-looking rig with bulging
tires and serious firepower on its bed.
This is precisely where the BTR-152
excelled. The Soviets knew it and produced a dazzling selection of variants
that carried almost all their large caliber machine guns in the 1950s. Ditto
every other army that found a use for the BTR-152, be they Palestinian freedom
fighters, the Vietnamese, the Israelis, and many others.
Although to call the BTR-152 “modular”
won’t cut it, different types of weapons were fitted into its spacious
passenger compartment. This converted the BTR-152 into a fighting vehicle that
could participate in mechanized combat (the 1967 Six-Day War) or vicious street
battles in the streets of Budapest or Beirut .
According to open sources the BTR-152’s
first public outing was a Red Square military
parade on November 7, 1951.
Meanwhile, in East Germany, the BTR-152 sat nine Germans and their machine gunner. That’s 10 people and still a lot more than the mech infantry squads crammed into APCs today. |
The original BTR-152’s sole armament was
the dependable 7.62x54mm Goryunov SG-43 mounted behind the enclosed cab.
Although a leftover from World War Two, it still uses a powerful round and has an awesome
rate of fire (500 rounds per minute), you couldn't really tell from the business end.
The Goryunov in action. Fun fact: The Chinese PLA actually converted it into a squad automatic weapon called the Type 67 by adding a pistol grip and a fixed wooden butt stock. |
It didn’t take long before the BTR-152’s
role shifted from an APC to a self-propelled anti-aircraft gun. As previously
mentioned, the first iteration of this variant was the BTR-152A, whose main
armament was the 14.5mm ZTPU-2/ZPU-2. Basically a pair of the notorious KPV
anti-tank machine guns that would become the BTR-series’ perpetual main
armament.
The 14.5x114mm KPV is no laughing matter.
It’s still the world’s most powerful machine gun that can penetrate the armor
of most APCs and military vehicles in use today. The KPV’s 1,000 meter range
made it just as lethal against low-flying aircraft.
Other sources suggest the BTR-152A also had
quad mounted 12.7x108mm DShK’s behind the Goryunov. Another variant, the
BTR-152D, was allegedly the one that mounted the ZPU-2’s. When Russian sources
are consulted this was revealed to be the BTR-152E. Confusing? Blame the
conflicting uncorrected “facts” of neglected open sources.
The configuration of the BTR-152A/D/E is
also interesting. The ZPU-2 is fixed behind the cab and seats a gunner. The
remaining space at the rear of the vehicle is for the spotter…who stands gazing
at the sky with his binoculars.
Here’s
another grainy picture of the
BTR-152 A/D from behind. It appears the ZPU-2 was installed on a
retrofitted ring mount whose exact designation has been lost to history.
|
It appears eight (yes, EIGHT) people can fit in a BTR-152 even with a 14.5mm ZPU-2 installed. Wow! |
The photo above is of a BTR-152A/D during the invasion of Czechoslovakia.
Come to think of it, the superb elevation of the ZPU-2 made it quite useful in
suppressing hostiles taking pot shots from windows during urban combat. But a
well-aimed Molotov cocktail can still completely crisp the BTR-152’s exposed
interior.
The Soviets later developed an
anti-aircraft BTR-152 that could mount a ZPU-4 in a different setup. Given how
the armor of the BTR-152 enclosed the entire vehicle, the ZPU was reconfigured
to have two KPV’s above the cab and two KPV’s behind them whose elevation could
be raised. Peculiar but sensible. The same from another angle:
It was the storm and stress of the
Palestinian struggle against Israel
that brought the BTR-152 to its lethal apogee. During the 1970s the PLO were
able to mount a ZU-23-2 anti-aircraft gun on a BTR-152. The result was
impressive in light of all the crappy Hilux technicals roving Third
World war zones today.
Keep in mind the original BTR-152 weighed a little over 8 tons. The ZU-23-2 added about 950 kilograms. Throw in a driver, gunner, and loader and the BTR-152 is somewhat encumbered and rather top heavy. Ergo this modification hampered the vehicle’s mobility.
The Israelis began seizing abandoned
BTR-152’s as early as the 1956 Sinai War. No doubt aware of the vehicle’s
potential (look at all that room at the back!) they soon figured out a 20mm
Hispano Suiza .404 anti-aircraft gun could fit inside it. Israel ’s first genuine SPAAG was
born and served with distinction during the Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War.
This rare low-quality and date
unknown photo reveals a bizarre mating of a US-made M61 Vulcan anti-aircraft
gun with a BTR-152. Was it effective?
|
Spot the differences! |
The vehicle was designated Walid and it
begat several variants, including a short-lived 122mm multi-rocket launcher
that saw extensive use in the Yom Kippur War. Several hundred Walid’s were
manufactured and select numbers were sold to Iraq
and Sudan
as well as a few other African countries. The Egyptian Army still maintains a
small fleet of its Walid APCs today.
PROTECTION
An armored vehicle’s absolute survival in
brutal combat is never a sure thing.
When facing modern anti-tank weapons, RPGs,
and autocannons, the long and short of it is the BTR-152’s “armor” is exactly
that. Armor in quotation marks. Almost as if there weren’t any to speak of.
Consider that the BTR-152 was
conceptualized in the fires of the Great Patriotic War, prototyped in the late
1940s, and built in the 1950s. This meant it was an extremely simple design, even
crude, and the fineries that are taken for granted in today’s personnel
carriers were non-existent.
Based on available open source
specifications of the BTR-152’s armor, the protection levels were distributed
in a familiar pattern. The cab and engine compartment were best protected,
followed by the sides, and then almost nothing at the bottom.
The annotated photo above of a BTR-152K
reveals its frontal armor around the cab was an impressive 15mm. This made it
impervious to sustained small arms fire.
The sides and rear were enclosed in welded
steel with a thickness of 9mm. A bit dicey, as NATO 7.62x51mm rounds, rifle grenades, and rockets
like the M72 LAW could’ve blown right through it.
The armor on the steel roof was little
better at 10mm. At least this could preserve any passengers from fragments and
flying shrapnel. A direct hit from rooftop RPG-7 would have turned the BTR-152K
into a fiery coffin.
The bottom, with its 300mm ground clearance,
had just 4mm.
Examining available photos of wrecked BTR-152’s
does reveal an interesting pattern. Few of these photos reveal any penetration
from small arms. It appears that shaped charges and explosions were the biggest
risks for BTR-152 crews.
Did somebody mention land mines?
But the cab is 100% intact. Now imagine if
a BTR-152 bore the brunt of an IED, i.e. a booby-trapped 155mm shell. If fragments tore through the bottom and hit
the gas tanks situated behind the driver’s seat the resulting inferno would
incinerate everything inside.
Another glaring weakness of the BTR-152 was
its open top. Until the BTR-152K arrived in limited numbers, the open top was a
juicy target for all kinds of mischief. See this, circa Hungarian revolt:
Take note of the different set of tires it uses—these are indicative of the ZiS-151. |
Throughout history people have been mesmerized by wreckage of any sort. Anyway, the warped side armor and the gaping hole suggest a shaped charge knocked out this BTR-152 and sent it careening into a wall where it burned to oblivion.
Though relatively intact, the mangled BTR-152 above suggests its fuel tank was detonated. It set fire to the engine
and blew the separate panels that serve as a hood and the burning fuel pooling up underneath the truck then melted the tires.
The remarkable part is the rest of the vehicle is intact.
MOBILITY
The BTR-152 originally ran on the 110 hp six cylinder ZiS-123 gasoline engine. This gave it a modest top speed of 65 km/h and a 650 km range.
From 1956 onwards it ran on the 107 hp six
cylinder ZiL-137K in-line gasoline engine.
For lack of a credible photograph
let this suffice as a glimpse into a BTR-152V’s engine. Note the radio antennae
and the windshield wiper underneath the polycarbonate windscreen. Also note the thickness of the armour plating sheltering the engine and its associated supporting elements.
It’s easy to dismiss the BTR-152 as a
primeval wheeled APC with questionable mobility on rough terrain. Like many
Soviet war machines the BTR-152 was also accused of being unreliable. Hindsight proves the first criticism
irrelevant and since no vehicle can run perfectly in all conditions it’s worth
mentioning the BTR-152 managed to honorably soldier on like a Cossack's horse in the snow, in the
tundra, in the desert, and in the tropics during its 65-year career.
The second barb - unreliability - is a
perplexing one given how long the BTR-152 remained in distinguished service for more than half a century, starting in 1951
with the Soviet Red Army until the present with various militaries. Furthermore,
the Vietnamese army remains the BTR-152’s most eager user. They most certainly know it’s an
old vehicle and modern alternatives can be imported from their suppliers, i.e. Russia , Israel ,
China , and South Korea ,
yet they’ve managed to keep it running and even upgraded it with a diesel
engine as recently as 2012.
The model above is a Vietnamese BTR-152B—notice the
mechanical winch beneath the grille as well as the addition of wing mirrors.
But the BTR-152 did have its shortcomings
that manifested as early as 1953 and its designers spent years grappling with
these. For a Soviet APC weighing between 8 to 10 tons (depending on the
variant) it had low permeability when running through snow or sand.
The tires were also completely exposed,
thereby risking getting punctured by multiple gunshots. This compelled the
installation of a central tire inflation system. To further improve its
mobility in the snow a separate externally mounted tire deflation system was
devised.
The BTR-152 above is running in snow with
each of its ZiS tires wrapped in snow chains.
But the BTR-152 did have a single glaring
weakness that its Soviet designers never completely overcame. Its 6x6 chassis
and the suspension and transmission that supported it wasn’t very capable running
over obstacles.
The BTR-152’s wheels, two at the front and
four at the back, used torsion bar suspension. But only the front had hydraulic
shock absorbers mated with leaf springs. The four wheels at the back had leaf
spring suspension too and no shock absorbers until 1957, a year after
production was moved to the ZiL factory.
In the mid-1950s a test involving the
upgraded ZiL BTR-152V and two earlier ZiS BTR-152B’s exposed this glaring
weakness. The BTR-152V successfully crossed a 2.5 meter wide trench that was
1.5 meters deep. Its rivals, BTR-152B’s, struggled to accomplish the same.
A BTR-152V caught in a moment of weakness. If you can’t exactly stop it with bullets a wide enough ditch can ruin its day. |
When BTR-152 production ceased in 1962 the
consensus on the 6x6 chassis was clear. Its suspension system was inadequate
for the rigors of cross-country movement against obstacles and even less
effective when amphibious crossings are required.
This led to the remaining BTR-152’s
“retirement” to rear echelon motor pools and security units once the BTR-60’s
long reign commenced.
CURRENT STATUS
For a vehicle with questionable protection
levels and mobility issues the BTR-152 proved an indomitable war machine. Based
on archival footage and photographs it had a sterling combat record in the Middle East where it fought in almost every Arab-Israeli
war from 1956 until the 1980s.
The BTR-152 had a very prominent role in
the Lebanese Civil War (1975-1990) where it functioned as a poor man’s fighting
vehicle for the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and other factions. The
Rhodesian Bush War (1964-1979) was another theater where it saw extensive use
by Soviet-backed forces.
At the same time the Soviets deployed the
BTR-152 and its brethren in Afghanistan —a
country littered with the charred hulks of wrecked BTR-series APCs.
Check out these Pashtun mujahideen posing in front of a wrecked BTR-152. Capturing the quad-DshK should have been quite a windfall. |
The image above portrays the BTR-152 in its
glory. Sure it can take abuse but don’t expect it to withstand direct hits
from shaped projectiles and calibers above 14.5mm. Notice the gaping hole
behind the driver’s seat? If it hit any lower it would’ve struck the fuel tank
and kaboom!
This is the state of most BTR-152’s today. It appears old fighting vehicles never die. They just collect rust and turn ugly. Notice the T-10M next to the ISU-122 at the back? |
Rare footage of an up-gunned BTR-152K fitted with a 14.5mm turret mounted on a custom roof. Take note of the viewing slits installed above the firing ports. |
Except for grim war zones the BTR-152 is no longer fielded by any national army even though its proliferation reached 40 countries across Europe, Asia, Africa, and
It survived the Cold War. Imagine that.
Yet its legacy lives on in the most
surprising way possible. In this day and age where roadside bombs loom large in
the minds of strategists and commanders armored trucks are once again in vogue.
There are a hundred different kinds of “tactical” and “mine-resistant” wheeled
vehicles peddled by at least a dozen countries today.
They’re easy to produce—India’s state-owned
factories had no trouble developing an indigenous MRAP based on a common truck
chassis—and can take on different roles, from battle taxis to command vehicles
to ambulances. Just like the BTR-152.
If one could imagine renewed production of
the BTR-152 with all of today’s bells and whistles the resulting platform could
be interesting. It won’t look pretty but it won’t be a pushover either. It’s
also perfectly suited for carrying big guns.
But fear not. Because the spirit of the
BTR-152 lives on…in the BPM-97*!
*You
can bet its armor is "inadequate" too since destroyed “separatist” BPM’s have
been spotted in Ukraine .
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Miguel Miranda is a writer based in the
His other interests span writing for
magazines, massage therapy, heavy metal, collecting old paperback novels, and
admiring good industrial design.
Miguel is the founder of 21st
Century Asian Arms Race (21AAR),
a website about modern weapon systems and their impact on ongoing wars and
crises across Eurasia .
The website was founded because Miguel got the impression that China was buying and reverse-engineering far too many advanced weapons for everybody else's comfort. Now he realizes a handful of powerful countries have made perpetual war a matter of business-as-usual and this is why the 21st century is going to be really something else. So he writes about this phenomenon instead.
Some of 21AAR’s content also takes on a historical and (gulp!) geopolitical perspective too, which means he’s got variety down pat.
In his spare time Miguel likes to be
affectionate toward living things. He’s currently working on an erotic spy
thriller.
An excellent article. Tell Mr. Miranda I loved it and I look forward to more guest articles and widespread recognition of this site.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the praise! Miguel is now working on a piece on the T-10 heavy tank. It'll turn up sometime mid-January, so stay tuned and Happy New Year!
Deletehttp://anwaralsharrad-mbt.blogspot.com/
ReplyDeleteI would say the US White Scout car inspired the Soviets more than the halftrack. the Soviets saw a lot of halftracks both US and German and seemed to opt more for full tracked or wheeled, only the Czechs went the half-track route with their copy of the German halftrack.
ReplyDeleteCzechs (or Czechoslovakia at that time, to be more precise) went not the German halftrack copy route. Czechoslovakian early APCs were built on parts of the German halftracks located on its area after the war. Based on combat experiences, some improvements, like added roof, were introduced. So it was a post-war development of German halftrack, not a copy. Similar situation was with some aircraft, like Me 109G, Si 204 or Ar 96.
DeleteLove to read it,Waiting For More new Update and I Already Read your Recent Post its Great Thanks.
ReplyDeletemilitary vehicles for sale
This picture in the post appears to show the quad DShK variant mentioned
ReplyDeletehttps://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DSOQ2xFKdm4/VnAnIskaoYI/AAAAAAAAFD8/44_oF70lngM/s1600/Soviet%2BBTR-152%2B01.jpg
"It appears the ZPU-2 was installed on a retrofitted ring mount whose exact designation has been lost to history."
ReplyDeleteZTPU-2
Astonishing article, very well researched and written!
ReplyDeleteFew comments:
ReplyDeletePhoto captioned "The photo above is of a BTR-152A/D in Hungary..." is in fact from operation Danube, the Soviet led invasion of the Warsaw pact armies into Czechoslovakia in August 1968. The inscription on the building reads The Czechoslovak Press Agency.
Also I have not came accross the BTR-152C version. In Russian alphabet (Azbuka), letter "C" stands for "S". So Russian "БТР-152С" should be transscripted as BTR-152S. Russian "C" stands for "связ (svyaz)", what means "communication", as correctly mentioned in the brief description.
BTR-152U version is missing here. "U" stands for "upravleniye" and can be translated as "command". This modification is shown on photo with not correct caption "Here’s the rare and completely weird BTR-152S, a command vehicle. It looks like a house built on a truck.". Nothing weird or rare here, just a regular command vehicle.
I have not read the whole article yet. At the moment I noticed just the above mentioned points.
And just a brief remark to some who commented this article already. Author has done a fairly good job, I won´t argue at all. Anyway, before praising it completely and trust in it like in God the almighty, please check also other sources, ideally Russian or ex-Soviet, where the info would be the most exact. BTR-152 was a Soviet APC, wasn´t it? ;)
Thanks for pointing out those errors. I'll forward them to Miguel Miranda immediately. Hopefully the errors will be corrected as soon as possible.
Delete
DeleteYour input is much appreciated!
El mejor articulo en español que he visto sobre el BTR 152. Gracias por tu trabajo
ReplyDeleteThank you for this great article !
ReplyDelete